Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the annual capacity of production, for the purpose of duty liability under the Pan Masala Rules, 2008, could be fixed by taking into account machines that had been sealed by the department and were not functioning during the relevant period.
Analysis: The lower authorities found that the capacity determination mechanism under the Pan Masala Rules is directed to operating machines which are functioning for manufacture, and not to machines that are sealed and not working. The sealing of the machines was not disputed. The Revenue's stand that the sealed machines could still be considered because they had wheels and could be removed from the factory was treated as a matter of assumption, since use of such machines would first require breaking the seal with the Revenue's consent and permission.
Conclusion: The sealed machines could not be included for fixation of annual capacity of production, and the Revenue's appeals were rejected.