Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pitch loading buckets used as material-handling equipment in the factory were eligible as capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The appeal was examined in the light of the settled position that Rule 57Q had been expanded by Notifications No. 11/95-CE (N.T.) dated 16.03.1995 and No. 14/96-CE (N.T.) dated 23.07.1996, and that goods brought within the ambit of capital goods by such notifications could not be treated as covered for periods earlier than their respective effective dates unless they were already covered by the pre-existing text of the rule. Applying that principle, the material-handling equipment in question was found to fall within the eligible category for the disputed period.
Conclusion: The pitch loading buckets were eligible capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q for the relevant period, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification enlarges the scope of capital goods under Rule 57Q, eligibility cannot be denied for the disputed period if the goods fall within the rule as applicable to that period, and the amendment operates only from its effective date unless the goods were already covered earlier.