Further investigation and charge alteration remain permissible after cognizance where evidence or defects in investigation justify correction.

Cognizance of an offence does not by itself bar further investigation under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and Section 173(8) remains available where investigation defects need correction to reach the truth. The trial court may alter or add charges before judgment on a proper appraisal of evidence and documents, provided the accused is not prejudiced or taken by surprise. If the charge changes, witnesses may be recalled as required. The document emphasises that the criminal process may still be adjusted during trial to ensure a fair and effective adjudication.

---

---

Issues: Whether further investigation was permissible and warranted after cognizance had been taken, and whether the trial court could alter or add charges on the basis of materials emerging during trial.

Analysis: The statutory scheme permits alteration or addition of charges before judgment under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and also enables recall of witnesses if the charge is changed. A charge may be amended by the trial court on a proper appraisal of the evidence and documents, provided the accused is not prejudiced or taken by surprise. Further investigation is not barred merely because the court has taken cognizance, and the possibility of delay cannot by itself prevent investigation if it is necessary to arrive at the truth and ensure a real and effective trial. The power under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 remains available even after cognizance, and where the head of the police department finds defects in investigation, further investigation can be justified.

Conclusion: Further investigation was held to be legally permissible, and the trial court retained power to alter or add charges if the evidence so required.

Final Conclusion: The matter was concluded with a recognition that the criminal process could still be corrected through further investigation and appropriate charge modification during trial, without foreclosing the prosecution or the accused from a fair adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi: Cognizance of an offence does not by itself bar further investigation under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the trial court may alter or add charges before judgment if the evidence so warrants and no prejudice is caused to the accused.

---