Territorial jurisdiction and same transaction rule under CrPC upheld for connected acts in a dowry death prosecution.

The general rule under Section 177 CrPC is that offences are tried by the court within whose local jurisdiction they were committed, but that rule is qualified by Section 220 where offences form part of the same transaction. Whether a series of acts constitutes the same transaction depends on factors such as proximity of time and place, continuity of action, and community of purpose. On the allegations in the FIR and complaint, the events leading to the death were treated as a connected sequence of acts, so the Bhagalpur Magistrate's territorial jurisdiction was not excluded and the challenge to the criminal proceedings on that ground failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Magistrate at Bhagalpur had territorial jurisdiction to try the offence under Section 304B IPC in view of Sections 177 and 220 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Analysis: Section 177 lays down the general rule that offences are ordinarily tried by the court within whose local jurisdiction they were committed, but the expression "ordinarily" admits of exceptions. Section 220 permits trial of more offences than one at the same trial when they form part of the same transaction. Whether acts form the same transaction depends on the circumstances, including proximity of time, unity or proximity of place, continuity of action and community of purpose or design. On the allegations in the FIR and complaint, the events culminating in the death were treated as a connected sequence of acts sufficient to attract Section 220.

Conclusion: The territorial jurisdiction of the Magistrate at Bhagalpur was not ousted, and the challenge to the criminal proceedings on that ground failed.

Ratio Decidendi: The general rule of territorial jurisdiction under Section 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is subject to the exception that offences forming part of the same transaction may be tried together under Section 220.

---