Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1954 (1) TMI 32 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Unguided licensing discretion in essential commodity control is unreasonable, while regulated coal price fixation was upheld. A regulatory order controlling coal trade under the Uttar Pradesh Coal Control Order, 1953 was examined for compatibility with Article 19(1)(g). The ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Unguided licensing discretion in essential commodity control is unreasonable, while regulated coal price fixation was upheld.

                          A regulatory order controlling coal trade under the Uttar Pradesh Coal Control Order, 1953 was examined for compatibility with Article 19(1)(g). The licensing clause was treated as invalid because it conferred unguided and unreviewable discretion to grant, refuse, suspend, revoke or cancel licences, making the restriction unreasonable under Article 19(6). By contrast, the compulsory sale scheme and price fixation in clauses 7 and 8 with Schedule III were upheld, as the price formula, locality-based limits and profit margin were not shown to be arbitrary or discriminatory on the record.




                          Issues: (i) Whether clause 4(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Coal Control Order, 1953, conferring unrestricted power to grant, refuse, renew, suspend, revoke, cancel or modify licences, imposed an unreasonable restriction on the freedom of trade and business guaranteed by Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. (ii) Whether clauses 7 and 8 read with Schedule III of the Control Order, dealing with compulsory sale of coal and fixation of prices, were unreasonable or discriminatory so as to be unconstitutional.

                          Issue (i): Whether clause 4(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Coal Control Order, 1953, conferring unrestricted power to grant, refuse, renew, suspend, revoke, cancel or modify licences, imposed an unreasonable restriction on the freedom of trade and business guaranteed by Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

                          Analysis: A control order regulating an essential commodity may validly require licences and permit administrative discretion, but such discretion must be guided by rules or principles and must not be arbitrary. Clause 4(3) vested absolute power in the licensing authority and permitted delegation to any person chosen by the State Coal Controller, without prescribing any standards, safeguards, or effective appellate or revisional control. Recording reasons was held insufficient because no higher authority was provided to test their propriety. The provision therefore left the matter to uncontrolled executive will and failed the test of reasonableness under Article 19(6).

                          Conclusion: Clause 4(3) was held invalid as imposing an unreasonable restriction on the petitioners' fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g). The cancellation of the petitioners' licence made under that clause was consequently ineffective and unenforceable.

                          Issue (ii): Whether clauses 7 and 8 read with Schedule III of the Control Order, dealing with compulsory sale of coal and fixation of prices, were unreasonable or discriminatory so as to be unconstitutional.

                          Analysis: The price formula in Schedule III was examined item by item. The actual landed-cost components were accepted as proper, and the allowance for incidental charges and shortage of weight was not shown on the materials before the Court to be arbitrary or discriminatory. The discretion given to the licensing authority was limited by the Schedule itself through maxima and locality-based standards. The fixed profit margin was treated as a part of the regulatory scheme intended to secure equitable distribution of an essential commodity and was not shown to be excessive or destructive of trade. On the record, the challenged fixation of prices did not warrant judicial interference.

                          Conclusion: Clauses 7 and 8, including Schedule III and the declaration of prices made thereunder, were upheld as valid and not in violation of Article 19(1)(g).

                          Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded only to the extent that the licence-cancellation provision and the cancellation order were struck down, while the scheme regulating compulsory sale and price fixation of coal was sustained.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A regulatory order affecting trade in an essential commodity is valid only so far as the discretion it confers is controlled by intelligible standards and is not left to arbitrary executive will; where a licensing power is unguided and unreviewable, it is an unreasonable restriction under Article 19(6).


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found