Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court quashes notices under Income-tax Act for 1984-85 & 1985-86</h1> <h3>Bhola Nath Majumdar Versus Income-Tax Officer And Others</h3> The court quashed and set aside the notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86, holding them to ... Assessment Proceedings, Capital Asset, Failure To Disclose Material Facts, Reason To Believe, Reassessment Proceedings Issues Involved:1. Validity of notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Whether the conditions precedent for assumption of jurisdiction under section 147(a) were satisfied.3. The role and admissibility of a valuation report obtained under section 55A in reopening completed assessments.4. Compliance with sections 147, 148, and 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of Notices Issued Under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The petitioner challenged the notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86. These notices were issued beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment years. The primary contention was that the Income-tax Officer had no 'reason to believe' that any income had escaped assessment. The court noted that the assessments were completed under section 143(1) or section 143(3) of the Act, and the notices for reopening were issued without specifying whether they were under section 147(a) or 147(b). The court presumed the notices were under section 147(a) since they were issued beyond four years.2. Conditions Precedent for Assumption of Jurisdiction Under Section 147(a):The petitioner argued that all relevant material facts were disclosed at the time of filing the returns, including the cost of construction of a house. The court examined the reasons recorded by the Income-tax Officer for reopening the assessment, which were based on a valuation report indicating a difference in the cost of construction. The court held that the valuation report was merely an opinion and did not constitute 'reason to believe' that income had escaped assessment due to the assessee's failure to disclose material facts fully and truly. The court emphasized that an opinion of a third person cannot substitute the 'reason to believe' of the Income-tax Officer.3. Role and Admissibility of Valuation Report Under Section 55A:The court analyzed the provisions of section 55A, which allows the Assessing Officer to refer the valuation of a capital asset to a Valuation Officer for ascertaining its fair market value. The court held that such a reference is valid only when the assessment is still pending. Once the assessment is completed, the Income-tax Officer becomes functus officio, and any valuation report obtained thereafter cannot be used to reopen a completed assessment. The court cited multiple judgments to support this view, including decisions from the Rajasthan, Punjab, and Calcutta High Courts.4. Compliance with Sections 147, 148, and 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The court examined whether the notices issued under section 148 complied with the provisions of sections 147 and 151. The court noted that the notices were issued after obtaining the necessary satisfaction from the Deputy Commissioner under section 151(2). However, the court held that the primary facts relating to the construction were fully and truly disclosed by the assessee, and there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts. The court concluded that the notices issued under section 148 were without jurisdiction and not in compliance with the provisions of the Act.Conclusion:The court quashed and set aside the notices dated December 13, 1990, issued for the assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86, holding them to be without jurisdiction and not in compliance with the provisions of sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petitions were allowed, and the rule issued in Civil Rule No. 356 of 1991 and Civil Rule No. 357 of 1991 was made absolute. There was no order as to costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found