Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee had failed to account for the source of the disputed amount and in observing that the amount was taxable as income of the accounting year 1943-44.
Analysis: The Tribunal had before it a specific contention that if the amount was taxable, it could not be brought to tax in the assessment year 1945-46 but belonged to the earlier year, and its appellate powers under section 33(4) of the Income-tax Act were wide enough to determine the proper year of assessment on the issues raised. The finding as to the year of taxability was not an extraneous matter or an impermissible enhancement, but a necessary step in deciding the assessee's own contention. The order also proceeded on the basis that the amount represented income from an undisclosed source, and income of that kind is normally referable to the relevant previous year.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was justified in recording the finding and in stating that the amount was to be brought to tax as income of the accounting year 1943-44. The answer was in the affirmative, against the assessee.