Transfer of tenancy post-contract not allowed under Bombay Rent Act - Precedent set in Jai Singh Murari case. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition for special leave based on the precedent set in Jai Singh Murari v. Sovani (P) Ltd., stating that the transfer of ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Transfer of tenancy post-contract not allowed under Bombay Rent Act - Precedent set in Jai Singh Murari case.
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition for special leave based on the precedent set in Jai Singh Murari v. Sovani (P) Ltd., stating that the transfer of a tenancy after it ceases to be contractual is impermissible under the Bombay Rent Act. The dissenting note in Damadilal v. Parashram was not considered as it did not relate to the Bombay Act, making the decision in Jai Singh's case binding.
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition for special leave based on the precedent set in Jai Singh Murari v. Sovani (P) Ltd., which stated that the transfer of a tenancy after it ceases to be contractual is not permissible under the Bombay Rent Act. The dissenting note in Damadilal v. Parashram was not considered as it did not pertain to the Bombay Act. The decision in Jai Singh's case remains binding.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
