Admitted appeal bars Tribunal enforcement and justifies interim stay against coercive implementation.

Once the High Court admitted the appeal against the original order, the Tribunal should not have proceeded to enforce that order. The party seeking implementation was required to approach the High Court for appropriate relief, and the pending admitted appeal justified protection against coercive enforcement. Ad interim relief in terms of the stay prayer was granted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal could direct implementation of its order when the appeal against the original order had already been admitted by the High Court, and whether ad interim stay relief should be granted.

Analysis: Once the appellate court had admitted the appeal, the Tribunal ought not to have proceeded to enforce its earlier order. The party seeking implementation could have approached the High Court for appropriate relief, and the pendency of the admitted appeal justified protection against coercive enforcement.

Outcome: Ad interim relief in terms of the stay prayer was granted.

---