Family settlement over estate disputes remains binding despite Court of Wards management, and benefit accepted bars challenge.

A bona fide family arrangement made to settle competing claims to an estate was treated as a complete and binding settlement where the deed, surrounding litigation and subsequent conduct showed that the parties intended final composition of family disputes. Such an arrangement was not regarded as a transfer or alienation in the ordinary sense and therefore was not hit by the prohibition in section 37(a) of the U.P. Court of Wards Act, 1912. Because the parties accepted benefits under the settlement and acted upon it, including release of property from wardship, a challenge to the deed was barred by estoppel.

---

---

Issues: Whether the compromise deed executed among the members of the family constituted a binding family arrangement and whether it was invalid because the estate was under the management of the Court of Wards.

Analysis: The document, read as a whole, settled competing claims to the estate and was intended to finally compose existing family disputes. The surrounding litigation, the recitals in the deed, and the conduct of the parties showed that it was acted upon as a complete settlement. A family arrangement is upheld on the broad ground that it resolves present or future disputes and promotes peace among persons with a genuine or possible claim to the property. Such a settlement is not treated as a transfer or alienation in the ordinary sense, and therefore does not attract the prohibition in section 37(a) of the U.P. Court of Wards Act, 1912. The plaintiff had taken benefit under the arrangement, and the parties had also acted upon it, including by payment and release of property from wardship, so the challenge was barred by estoppel.

Conclusion: The compromise deed was a valid and binding family arrangement, and the challenge based on the Court of Wards failed.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable on the merits, and the decree below was affirmed in full.

Ratio Decidendi: A bona fide family settlement entered into to resolve disputes among persons having a real or possible claim to the property is enforceable and is not invalidated by the mere fact that the property is under Court of Wards management; a party who has accepted benefit under such a settlement is estopped from impeaching it.

---