TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Revenue's Appeal Dismissed on Warranty Expenses Penalty Assessment for AY 2001-02</h1> <h3>DCIT, Circle 16 (1), New Delhi Versus M/s Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The Revenue's appeal against the CIT(A) order for the assessment year 2001-02 regarding the penalty on the provision for warranty expenses was dismissed. ... - Issues involved: Revenue appeal against CIT(A) order for AY 2001-02 regarding penalty on provision for warranty expenses.Brief facts: AO made addition of &8377; 31,82,677/- for provision of warranty expenses. Tribunal allowed deduction of &8377; 7,29,428/- as actual expenses. AO imposed penalty of &8377; 53,33,101/- for both disallowances. CIT(A) deleted entire penalty. Revenue appealed for penalty on provision of warranty expenses confirmed by Tribunal.Legal analysis: Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) relevant. Situations where addition or disallowance represent concealed income outlined. Assessee made provision @ 1% of gross sales for warranty expenses based on technical estimate and experience. Tribunal allowed deduction based on actual expenditure incurred. Tribunal's basis not that provision was excessive or unreasonable. Assessee disclosed provision in notes, stating it's based on technical estimate. Tribunal noted year-wise provision and actual expenses, showing rising actual expenses each year. Assessee's explanation considered bona fide, no concealment of income found. Section 271(1)(c) not applicable. CIT(A) deletion of penalty upheld.Conclusion: Revenue appeal dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
