TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal cancels penalties for inaccurate income particulars in appeal decisions for AY 1996-97 & 1997-98</h1> <h3>Yogeshwar Corporation Versus ITO</h3> The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals for Assessment Years 1996-97 and 1997-98, setting aside the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for ... - Issues involved: Appeal against penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income for Assessment Years 1996-97 & 1997-98.Assessment Year 1996-97:The Assessing Officer made additions for bogus purchases, confirmed by CIT(Appeals), leading to penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Tribunal sustained addition at 25% of bogus purchases, following precedent where penalty was deleted for estimated additions. Penalty of Rs. 3,23,040/- for this year was deleted.Assessment Year 1997-98:Additions for payments on bogus purchases were partially deleted by Tribunal, rendering the penalty baseless. Penalty of Rs. 1,31,039/- for this year was deleted.The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for both years, setting aside the penalties imposed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
