TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the disallowance of expenditure relatable to exempt dividend income under section 14A required reconsideration and recomputation. (ii) Whether computer peripherals such as printer and scanner were entitled to depreciation at the higher rate applicable to computers.
Issue (i): Whether the disallowance of expenditure relatable to exempt dividend income under section 14A required reconsideration and recomputation.
Analysis: The assessee had earned dividend income exempt under section 10(34) and the Assessing Officer made a proportionate disallowance under section 14A in the absence of details. The appellate authority restricted the disallowance to a nominal amount, but the matter was already covered by the Tribunal's earlier direction and by the Special Bench view that disallowance under section 14A had to be worked out afresh in accordance with the amended provisions and the prescribed method.
Conclusion: The issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for recomputation of the disallowance; the assessee did not succeed on this ground.
Issue (ii): Whether computer peripherals such as printer and scanner were entitled to depreciation at the higher rate applicable to computers.
Analysis: The term computer was construed broadly to include the computer system and its integral components. Printer and scanner could not function independently of the computer and were treated as part of the computer system for depreciation purposes.
Conclusion: Higher depreciation at 60% on computer peripherals was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only on the issue of section 14A disallowance and failed on the depreciation issue, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal for statistical purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure attributable to exempt income under section 14A must be recomputed in accordance with the applicable amended framework, and computer peripherals that are integral to the computer system are eligible for the higher rate of depreciation applicable to computers.
TaxTMI 
