Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of section 35(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, distribution made by a liquidator to shareholders on liquidation could be treated as a dividend so as to attract recomputation of rebate originally allowed to the company.
Analysis: Section 35(10) applied where rebate of income-tax had been allowed on a part of the company's total income and the amount on which rebate was allowed was later availed of for declaring dividends. The definition of "dividend" in section 2(6A)(c) expressly included distribution to shareholders out of accumulated profits on liquidation. There was no repugnancy between the charging provision and the definition clause, and the word "declaring" in section 35(10) did not justify excluding liquidation distributions from the statutory meaning of dividend. A deeming provision must be given its full effect in the statutory context.
Conclusion: Distribution by a liquidator on liquidation fell within the statutory concept of dividend for section 35(10), and the Income-tax Officer was entitled to recompute the rebate. The petition failed.