Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court rules on interest disallowance but allows extra depreciation for diesel engines under Income-tax Act.</h1> <h3>Mir Mohd Ali Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras</h3> The court ruled in favor of the tax authorities regarding the disallowance of a portion of interest payments on borrowed amounts by the assessee for ... - Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of a portion of interest payments on borrowed amounts.2. Admissibility of extra depreciation for diesel engines fitted to motor vehicles under sections 10(2)(vi) and 10(2)(via) of the Income-tax Act.Detailed Analysis:1. Disallowance of a portion of interest payments on borrowed amounts:The first issue addressed was whether the disallowance of any portion of interest payments of Rs. 12,541 in the first year, Rs. 20,851 in the second year, and Rs. 40,302 in the third year on amounts borrowed by the assessee for business purposes was correct. The Tribunal accepted that the assessee paid these amounts towards interest on loans but only allowed deductions of Rs. 8,000, Rs. 14,000, and Rs. 13,000 for the respective years. The accounts of the assessee were rejected as unreliable, necessitating an estimation of gross income under the proviso to section 13 of the Act. The Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal overruled the Income-tax Officer's view that no deduction was allowable under these circumstances. However, the assessee failed to prove that each loan on which interest was paid was utilized for the business. With no reliable accounts for the third year and the first two years' books rejected, the Tribunal had to estimate the interest payments related to the transport business. The court found no material to support any contention that the Tribunal's estimates were unreasonable. Therefore, the court answered the first question in the affirmative and against the assessee.2. Admissibility of extra depreciation for diesel engines fitted to motor vehicles:The second issue related to whether extra depreciation is admissible under sections 10(2)(vi) and 10(2)(via) of the Income-tax Act for diesel engines fitted to motor vehicles in replacement of existing engines. The assessee replaced petrol engines in two buses with diesel engines, incurring an expenditure of Rs. 18,544. The Income-tax Officer allowed normal depreciation but disallowed claims for additional and special depreciation under sections 10(2)(vi) and 10(2)(via), a decision upheld by the Tribunal. The court amended the question to include both sections 10(2)(vi) and 10(2)(via).Sections 10(2)(vi) and 10(2)(via) provide for depreciation allowances for machinery and plant used in the business. The term 'machinery' was interpreted based on its normal meaning and the Privy Council's definition in Corporation of Calcutta Vs Chairman, Cossipore and Chitpore Municipality. The court concluded that a diesel engine qualifies as machinery.The Tribunal's reasons for disallowing the claim included irrelevant factors, such as the assessee not showing the sale price of old engines or proving the old engines were faulty. The court found it unnecessary for the assessee to prove immediate profit improvement from the diesel engines. The Tribunal's view that a diesel engine cannot be considered machinery for extra depreciation was rejected. The court disagreed with the Bombay High Court's decision in Maneklal Vallabhdas Parekh Vs Commissioner of Income-tax, which required machinery to be a self-contained unit. The court held that machinery does not lose its identity when integrated with other machinery or plant. Thus, the diesel engines were considered new machinery eligible for additional depreciation under sections 10(2)(vi) and 10(2)(via).The court concluded that the assessee was entitled to the depreciation allowances claimed and answered the second question in the affirmative and in favor of the assessee.Conclusion:The court answered the first question in the affirmative, against the assessee, and the second question in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found