Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee entitled to deductions for manufacturing structural components under section 80-IB</h1> <h3>Steelfab Building Systems Versus Income-tax Officer, Range 24 (3) (3), Mumbai</h3> The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals, determining that the manufacturing activities of producing beams, columns, rafters, and other structural ... - Issues Involved:1. Entitlement to deduction under section 80-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Determination of whether the assessee's activities constitute 'manufacture' or 'production' of an article or thing.Detailed Analysis:1. Entitlement to Deduction Under Section 80-IB:The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing various types of sheets and pre-engineered building material, claimed deductions under section 80-IB for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07. The central issue was whether the assessee's activities qualified as 'manufacture' or 'production' of an article or thing, which is a prerequisite for claiming the deduction.2. Determination of Whether the Activities Constitute 'Manufacture' or 'Production':The core of the dispute was whether the assessee's activities of producing beams, columns, rafters, girders, and other structural components could be considered as manufacturing or producing an article or thing. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] held that the activities did not qualify as manufacturing, primarily because the end products were used in constructing buildings, which they considered as intermediary items.Assessee's Argument:- The assessee provided detailed descriptions and photographs of the manufacturing process, highlighting the transformation of raw materials into distinct products like beams, columns, and rafters.- The assessee argued that the products had distinct names and uses in the trade, satisfying the commercial recognition test.- The assessee submitted expert opinions and certificates from customers and industry bodies, supporting the claim that the activities constituted heavy manufacturing.Assessing Officer's Argument:- The AO contended that the activities involved merely processing steel into different shapes, which did not result in a new and distinct product.- The AO relied on the Supreme Court decision in CIT v. N.C. Budhiraja & Co., where constructing a dam was not considered manufacturing for section 80HH purposes.- The AO dismissed the relevance of the assessee being recognized as a manufacturer by Central Excise and other authorities.CIT(A)'s Ruling:- The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, emphasizing that the products were intermediary items used in building construction.- The CIT(A) cited the Gujarat High Court decision in Cellulose Products of India Ltd. v. CIT, which held that only the end product, not intermediary items, should be considered for deduction purposes.Tribunal's Analysis:- The Tribunal reviewed the detailed manufacturing process and the distinct commercial identity of the products.- The Tribunal referred to several Supreme Court decisions, including ITO v. Arihant Tiles & Marbles (P.) Ltd., which held that converting marble blocks into slabs and tiles constituted manufacturing.- The Tribunal noted that the assessee's products were distinct in the trade and involved significant technical and mechanical processes, transforming raw materials into new articles.- The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)'s reliance on N.C. Budhiraja & Co., as the assessee was not constructing buildings but manufacturing materials for the construction industry.Conclusion:- The Tribunal concluded that the assessee's activities constituted manufacturing or production of an article or thing.- The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80-IB for the assessment years in question.Summary:The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals, holding that the activities of manufacturing beams, columns, rafters, and other structural components qualified as manufacturing or production of an article or thing. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to deductions under section 80-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found