TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns Rs. 1 lakh addition in debtor's account due to lack of evidence</h1> <h3>M/s. Ply Palace Versus ITO, Ward-39 (2),</h3> M/s. Ply Palace Versus ITO, Ward-39 (2), - TMI Issues:1. Addition of Rs. 1 lakh made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) on account of difference in the balance of one debtor, M/s. Sen & Associates.Detailed Analysis:The appeal was filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2010-11 regarding the addition of Rs. 1 lakh due to a difference in the balance of a debtor, M/s. Sen & Associates. The AO found a discrepancy in the debtor's balance, which the assessee tried to explain but was not accepted. The AO added the difference to the total income, considering it as a bogus balance. The CIT(A) upheld the addition partially, stating that the balance difference of Rs. 1 lakh was liable to be added under section 69A or 69C of the Act. The assessee contended that the balance was a result of sales made to the debtor and any unaccounted payment should not be treated as income to avoid double addition.The Tribunal heard arguments and reviewed documents. It noted that the balance discrepancy arose from unaccounted payments by the debtor, which were not reflected in the assessee's books. The CIT(A) sustained the addition based on the assumption that the unaccounted amount might have been spent by the assessee outside the books or was available with the assessee. The Tribunal found this basis unsupported by evidence, relying on surmises and conjectures. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A).In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, overturning the addition of Rs. 1 lakh based on the unsupported basis adopted by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found the reasoning for sustaining the addition not substantiated by evidence and relying on mere assumptions, leading to the deletion of the disputed amount from the assessee's total income for the relevant assessment year.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
