Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a member who becomes disqualified under Rule 25(1)(c)(iii) of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Rules, 1973 ceases to be a member of both housing societies or only of the society in respect of which the disqualification is incurred.
Analysis: Rule 24 governs admission to membership, Rule 25 specifies disqualifications, Rule 25(2) creates a deeming fiction of cessation from the date the disqualification is incurred, and Rule 28 separately empowers the Registrar to direct removal from either or both societies when a person becomes a member of two co-operative societies of the same class. Reading the provisions together, a harmonious construction requires that Rule 25(2) operate in relation to the society with which the disqualification arises, otherwise Rule 28 would be rendered otiose. The disqualification under Rule 25(1)(c)(iii) attaches to the second housing society, not the first, and the deeming cessation is confined to that second society.
Conclusion: The appellant ceased to be a member only of the later housing society and his membership of the first housing society remained unaffected; the orders directing cessation from both societies were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory disqualification is incurred on becoming a member of a second housing society, the deeming cessation provision must be confined to that society and must be construed harmoniously with a separate provision empowering the Registrar to direct removal from either or both societies.