TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CIT(Appeals) jurisdiction exceeded converting assessment, Tribunal sets aside directions, emphasizes procedural compliance</h1> <h3>Mrs. Treety K. Sahni Versus Income-tax Officer</h3> Mrs. Treety K. Sahni Versus Income-tax Officer - TMI Issues:1. Jurisdiction of CIT(Appeals) to convert assessment under section 143(1)(a) into assessment under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act.2. Authority of CIT(Appeals) to issue directions to Assessing Officer beyond his competence.3. Applicability of Hon'ble Supreme Court decisions in determining the legality of adjustments made by Assessing Officer.Analysis:Issue 1: The appeal challenged the CIT(Appeals)'s action of converting an assessment under section 143(1)(a) into an assessment under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act. The appellant argued that the CIT(Appeals) lacked jurisdiction to make this conversion, especially since the time limit for issuing a notice under section 143(2) had expired. The Tribunal held that the CIT(Appeals) could not change the subject matter of the appeal and direct the Assessing Officer to apply a provision he was not competent to apply. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal concluded that the directions issued by the CIT(Appeals) were not in accordance with the law and set them aside, canceling the adjustments made by the Assessing Officer.Issue 2: The Tribunal also examined the authority of the CIT(Appeals) to issue directions to the Assessing Officer beyond his competence. It was argued that the CIT(Appeals) could not convert a case of prima facie adjustment under section 143(1)(a) into a regular assessment under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that even though the power of the CIT(Appeals) is wider, he cannot direct actions that the Assessing Officer is not authorized to take. The Tribunal referenced relevant case law to support its conclusion that the directions issued by the CIT(Appeals) were without jurisdiction and set them aside.Issue 3: The appellant contended that the adjustments made by the Assessing Officer were arbitrary and without jurisdiction, citing the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a specific case. The Tribunal acknowledged the applicability of the Supreme Court's decision in determining the legality of the adjustments. However, it focused on the procedural aspects and limitations regarding the Assessing Officer's authority to make such adjustments. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the directions issued by the CIT(Appeals) were not in accordance with the law, and canceled the adjustments made by the Assessing Officer.This judgment clarifies the boundaries of authority for the CIT(Appeals) and the Assessing Officer in making assessments and adjustments under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and jurisdictional limits in tax matters.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
