Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum of Rs. 25,000 payable to the beneficiary under the trust was assessable in the hands of the trustees when it had already been assessed in the beneficiary's hands.
Analysis: The amount payable to the beneficiary was not treated as diverted at source by an overriding title, because the trust income first came to the trustees and was then applied in accordance with the trust deed. The amount also was not an admissible charge on the trust property under section 9(1)(iv). The decisive consideration was that section 41 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 provided alternative modes of assessment, either in the hands of the trustees or directly in the hands of the person on whose behalf the income was receivable. The beneficiary had already been validly assessed on the very amount under section 41(2), and the department had recovered tax from her. Once that course was adopted, the same amount could not again be assessed in the hands of the trustees.
Conclusion: The sum of Rs. 25,000 was not assessable again in the hands of the assessee-trustees.
Ratio Decidendi: Where trust income has already been validly assessed in the hands of the beneficiary under section 41(2), the same income cannot be assessed again in the hands of the trustees under section 41(1).