Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee paid a higher price for 68,208 lbs. of styron for extra-commercial reasons.
Analysis: The governing principle is that the taxing authority cannot substitute its own standard of reasonableness for that of the assessee where the transaction is genuine and the payment is truly made for business purposes. That principle yields where the transaction is not straightforward, where considerations other than business purpose are shown, or where the payment is made for an oblique purpose outside the course of business. On the facts, the assessee bought the same material from a concern with identical partners at a price far above the market price paid to another supplier, and the transaction resulted in deflation of the assessee's profits. The explanation that the other concern was closing down did not displace the inference drawn from the surrounding circumstances.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee paid the higher price for extra-commercial reasons, and the answer is in the affirmative.
Ratio Decidendi: In determining deductibility or the true character of business expenditure, the assessee's own commercial judgment is ordinarily respected, but a finding of extra-commercial purpose may be sustained where the transaction is not genuine in substance or where surrounding circumstances show that the payment was made for reasons other than business expediency.