TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether wheeling, transmission and State Load Dispatch Centre charges paid to the transmission utility were fees for technical services liable to tax deduction at source under section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether interest under section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable on the assessee for non-deduction of tax at source on such payments.
Issue (i): Whether wheeling, transmission and State Load Dispatch Centre charges paid to the transmission utility were fees for technical services liable to tax deduction at source under section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payment was made for use of the transmission system and for charges fixed by the Regulatory Commission on the principle of regulated tariff. The transmission utility was performing statutory functions under the Electricity Act, 2003, and the use of its transmission network did not amount to rendering technical services to the assessee. The expression 'fees for technical services' requires managerial, technical or consultancy services involving a human element, and mere use of an automated or sophisticated system does not satisfy that test. The charges were also found to be in the nature of reimbursement of regulated cost rather than income for technical services.
Conclusion: The payments were not liable to tax deduction at source under section 194J, and the assessee's stand was accepted.
Issue (ii): Whether interest under section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable on the assessee for non-deduction of tax at source on such payments.
Analysis: Interest under section 201(1A) is compensatory and depends on the existence of tax loss to the Revenue. The recipient had no tax liability and had either nil income or refunds, so no revenue loss arose from the alleged default. In these circumstances, the charging of interest for the period of default was not justified.
Conclusion: Interest under section 201(1A) was not leviable, and the assessee's stand was accepted.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded in full, with the demand under section 194J and the consequential interest under section 201(1A) both set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: 'Fees for technical services' under section 194J requires rendering of managerial, technical or consultancy services involving human intervention and the making available of technical knowledge or skill; mere use of a regulated, automated or sophisticated transmission facility does not amount to such services, and compensatory interest under section 201(1A) is not leviable where no tax is payable by the recipient.
TaxTMI 
