Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (10) TMI 1385 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Disability reservation is horizontal and vacancy-based, computed on total vacancies, not limited by identified posts or the vertical quota ceiling. Reservation for persons with disabilities under Section 33 is computed on total vacancies in the establishment, not confined to already identified posts, ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Disability reservation is horizontal and vacancy-based, computed on total vacancies, not limited by identified posts or the vertical quota ceiling.

                            Reservation for persons with disabilities under Section 33 is computed on total vacancies in the establishment, not confined to already identified posts, because post identification regulates appointment against the quota rather than the computation of the quota itself. The scheme is vacancy-based and the statutory text prevails over the heading "Reservation of Posts"; executive instructions inconsistent with that mandate cannot control the reservation regime. The 50% ceiling applicable to vertical reservations does not apply, because disability reservation operates as a horizontal reservation under Article 16(1) and is adjusted within the respective vertical categories without reducing SC, ST or OBC entitlement.




                            Issues: (i) Whether reservation for persons with disabilities under Section 33 of the Act is to be computed on the basis of total vacancies in the cadre strength or only on identified posts; (ii) Whether the reservation scheme under the Act is vacancy-based or post-based; (iii) Whether the 50% ceiling applicable to vertical reservations applies to reservation for persons with disabilities.

                            Issue (i): Whether reservation for persons with disabilities under Section 33 of the Act is to be computed on the basis of total vacancies in the cadre strength or only on identified posts.

                            Analysis: Section 32 requires identification of posts for appointments of persons with disabilities, but that identification operates at the stage of filling the reserved vacancies and does not control the computation of reservation itself. Section 33, read as a whole, mandates that every appropriate Government shall appoint not less than 3% of vacancies for persons with disabilities, with one per cent each for the three specified disability categories in the identified posts for each disability. The proviso to Section 33 and the scheme reflected in Section 41 confirm that the legislative intent is to secure minimum representation through reservation computed on vacancies in the establishment, not to confine the quota to already identified posts alone.

                            Conclusion: The reservation under Section 33 is to be computed on total vacancies in the cadre strength and not restricted to identified posts; this issue is decided against the appellant.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the reservation scheme under the Act is vacancy-based or post-based.

                            Analysis: The Court held that the heading "Reservation of Posts" cannot override the clear text of Section 33. The statutory language imposes a duty to reserve a minimum percentage of vacancies, while identification of posts is relevant to the actual appointment against those vacancies. The earlier constitutional doctrine concerning cadre-strength and post-based reservation for vertical categories was found inapplicable because reservation for persons with disabilities is horizontal and operates differently. The Office Memorandum dated 29.12.2005 was inconsistent with this position to the extent it departed from the statutory mandate.

                            Conclusion: The scheme is vacancy-based and not post-based; this issue is decided against the appellant.

                            Issue (iii): Whether the 50% ceiling applicable to vertical reservations applies to reservation for persons with disabilities.

                            Analysis: Reservation for persons with disabilities was treated as horizontal reservation under Article 16(1) of the Constitution of India, cutting across vertical reservations under Article 16(4). The ceiling principle laid down for vertical reservations does not govern this scheme, because the disability quota does not reduce the percentage available to SC, ST and OBC categories and is adjusted within the respective vertical categories.

                            Conclusion: The 50% ceiling does not apply to reservation for persons with disabilities; this issue is decided against the appellant.

                            Final Conclusion: The statutory scheme for persons with disabilities was held to require uniform computation of 3% reservation on total vacancies in all establishments, with the impugned executive instructions modified to conform to that mandate and consequential directions issued for implementation.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Reservation for persons with disabilities under Section 33 of the Act is a horizontal, vacancy-based reservation to be computed on the total vacancies in an establishment, while identification of posts is relevant only for actual appointments and does not limit the computation of the quota.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found