Tribunal Upholds CIT(A)'s Decision on Windmill Depreciation for 2009-10

The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision regarding depreciation on windmill components and installation costs for the assessment year 2009-10. Citing a previous order for the assessment year 2007-08, the Tribunal upheld the eligibility of certain costs for higher depreciation rates and apportionment of costs towards eligible assets. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed based on precedent and reasoning from the previous decision, with the Tribunal finding no grounds to interfere with the relief granted by the CIT(A). The decision was announced in the presence of both parties, concluding the hearing.

---

---

Issues:
Depreciation on windmill components and installation costs.

Analysis:
The appeal concerns the depreciation on windmills for the assessment year 2009-10. The Revenue raised grounds challenging the inclusion of various components in the cost of the windmill for depreciation purposes. The first issue was the inclusion of components like electrical items and tubular towers in the cost of the windmill for allowing depreciation at a special rate. The second issue involved the allocation of labor costs related to the installation of the wind turbine generator for depreciation at a special rate. The third and fourth issues pertained to the application of a specific depreciation rate and the allowance of depreciation on processing charges. The assessee, engaged in manufacturing and electricity generation, faced disallowances by the Assessing Officer, reducing the claimed depreciation. The CIT(A) partially upheld the assessee's claim based on a previous order for the assessment year 2007-08.

The Tribunal referred to the previous decision for the assessment year 2007-08, where the CIT(A) had allowed relief to the assessee, a decision affirmed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal analyzed the breakdown of expenses related to the windmill installation, considering various components like electrical yard installation, labor charges, processing fees, and application fees. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on the eligibility of certain costs for higher depreciation rates, following the precedent set in previous cases. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s apportionment of costs towards eligible assets and civil costs, allowing depreciation accordingly. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the relief granted by the CIT(A) regarding the depreciation on the windmill components and installation costs.

Given the similarity in facts and circumstances with the previous assessment year, the Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision for the current assessment year. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed based on the precedent and the reasoning provided in the previous decision. The Tribunal announced the decision in the presence of both parties at the conclusion of the hearing, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

---