Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee wins capital gains case, Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeals

        Dreamland Build Tech. P. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 10 (1) New Delhi

        Dreamland Build Tech. P. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 10 (1) New Delhi - TMI Issues Involved:
        1. Classification of gains from the sale of shares as business income or short-term capital gain.
        2. Allowance of proportionate expenses of securities transactions tax as a deduction from business income.
        3. Double addition of fees paid to the Registrar of Companies.
        4. Disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.

        Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

        1. Classification of Gains from Sale of Shares:
        The primary issue in this case was whether the gains from the sale of shares should be treated as business income or short-term capital gains. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the gains as business income, citing reasons such as regular and continuous transactions, lack of separate books for investments and business, and short holding periods of shares. The First Appellate Authority partly agreed with the assessee, treating gains from shares held for more than 30 days as short-term capital gains and those held for less than 30 days as business income.

        The Tribunal, however, disagreed with the First Appellate Authority's segregation based on the holding period. It emphasized that the intention behind the transactions and other factors, such as the classification of shares as investments in the balance sheet, the absence of borrowed funds, and the acceptance of similar gains as capital gains in previous years, were crucial. The Tribunal concluded that the gains should be treated as capital gains, not business income, and rejected the artificial segregation based on the holding period.

        2. Allowance of Proportionate Expenses of Securities Transactions Tax:
        The Revenue's appeal included a ground challenging the direction to allow proportionate expenses of securities transactions tax as a deduction from business income. However, since the Tribunal concluded that the gains should be treated as capital gains, this issue became moot, and the Revenue's appeal on this ground was dismissed.

        3. Double Addition of Fees Paid to Registrar of Companies:
        The assessee claimed that the fees paid to the Registrar of Companies had been disallowed twice. The Tribunal set aside this matter to the AO for verification and necessary orders, ensuring that any double addition would be corrected.

        4. Disallowance of Expenditure under Section 14A:
        For the AY 2007-08, the AO disallowed expenditure under Section 14A, which pertains to expenses incurred in relation to income not forming part of total income. The Tribunal referred to the jurisdictional High Court's decision, which held that Section 14A cannot be invoked when no exempt income is earned. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside this issue to the AO for fresh adjudication, instructing the AO to verify whether the assessee earned tax-free income during the year and to apply the law accordingly.

        Conclusion:
        The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals in part, treating the gains from the sale of shares as capital gains and not business income. It also addressed the issue of double addition of fees and disallowance under Section 14A, setting aside these matters for further verification and proper adjudication. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found