TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT decision: Excess Depreciation & Section 14A Disallowance Appeals Partially Allowed</h1> <h3>ACIT Circle-10 (1) New Delhi Versus Versus DCM Engineering Ltd. and DCM Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle (10) 1, New Delhi</h3> The ITAT partially allowed both appeals related to the deletion of disallowance on excess depreciation on computer peripherals and the restriction of ... - Issues involved:The judgment involves issues related to the deletion of disallowance on excess depreciation on computer peripherals and the restriction of disallowance under section 14A.Issue No.-1 (Revenue):The Assessing Officer disallowed excess depreciation claimed by the assessee on computer peripherals. The CIT(A) deleted this disallowance, which was upheld by the ITAT based on previous decisions and the absence of any adverse orders against the CIT(A) action in previous years.Issue No-2 (Revenue) & Ground No.1 (Assessee):The dispute revolves around the disallowance under section 14A on investments in shares. The Assessing Officer computed a disallowance using Rule 8D, which the CIT(A) reduced. The ITAT found the CIT(A)'s reasoning to be general and lacking specific details, remanding the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision in line with relevant court decisions.Ground No-2 (Assessee):This ground concerns the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The ITAT deemed it premature to interfere with these independent proceedings at this stage, rejecting the ground.In conclusion, the ITAT partially allowed both appeals, with the order pronounced on 31 May 2013.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
