1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal Extends Stay in Pending Cases, Following Precedent</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI granted extension of stay in various cases due to heavy pendency, following the precedent set in a previous case. ... Extension of stay order beyond 365 days - matters the appeal could not be disposed of on account of heavy pendency and the delay in non-disposal is not attributable to the appellants. - Held that:- The Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Delhi [2014 (10) TMI 724 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)] has held that when the delay in disposing of appeal is not attributable to the appellants, extension of stay can be granted. - Stay extended. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI granted extension of stay in various cases where appeal could not be disposed of due to heavy pendency, following the precedent set in M/s Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Delhi. All miscellaneous applications for extension of stay were allowed.