Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>SSI Exemption Denied: Tribunal Orders Reconsideration for Procedural Fairness and Transparency</h1> <h3>M/s. Agmeco Faucets Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, Delhi-I</h3> The Tribunal set aside the decision denying SSI exemption under Central Excise Duty, citing discrepancies in clearance calculations and lack of disclosure ... Denial of SSI Exemption - exemption notification no. 8/03CE - Captive consumption - whether the aggregate value of the appellants clearances for home consumption during 2008-09 was ₹ 3,36,81,178/- as claimed by them or had exceeded ₹ 4 crore and was valued at ₹ 4,16,75,078/- has held by the Additional Commissioner - Held that:- departments calculations regarding the aggregate value of clearances for home consumption during 2008-09 are based on Deputy Commissioners report dated 19/2/2013. The hearing in this case had been held on 13/01/2013. The Deputy Commissioners report dated 19/2/2013 which has been relied upon by the Additional Commissioner, has, thus, not been supplied to the appellant which would amount to violation of the principles of natural justice. The difference between the value of clearances as per the appellant and the value of the clearances as per the department, appears to be on account of the number of items which are covered for valuation under section 4A and this dispute can be resolved only when the basis of the calculation as per the Deputy Commissioners report is disclosed to the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for de-novo adjudication - Decided in favour of assessee. Issues:1. Denial of SSI exemption under Central Excise Duty for the period from 1/4/2009 to 18/8/2009.2. Calculation of aggregate value of clearances for home consumption during 2008-09.3. Adjudication process and imposition of penalty under sections 11AB and 11AC.Analysis:1. The appellant, a manufacturer of bathroom fittings, was availing the SSI exemption notification no. 8/03CE for the period in dispute. The Department sought to deny the exemption based on the appellant's total clearances for home consumption during the preceding financial year. The Additional Commissioner confirmed the duty demand and imposed a penalty under section 11AC. On appeal, the Commissioner (appeals) upheld the decision. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the calculation of clearances and lack of disclosure of the Deputy Commissioner's report, leading to a violation of natural justice. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for de-novo adjudication after providing the appellant with the report and a personal hearing.2. The core issue revolved around the calculation of the aggregate value of the appellant's clearances for home consumption during 2008-09. The Department's calculations were based on the Deputy Commissioner's report dated 19/2/2013, which was not provided to the appellant during the adjudication process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of disclosing the basis of calculation to resolve the dispute regarding the value of clearances. The lack of access to crucial information led to a violation of natural justice, necessitating a fresh adjudication with the appellant's involvement and access to the relevant report.3. The adjudication process and imposition of penalty under sections 11AB and 11AC were scrutinized in light of the procedural irregularities. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of adhering to principles of natural justice, particularly in cases where crucial reports or documents form the basis of decisions affecting the parties involved. The remand for de-novo adjudication underscored the need for a fair and transparent process, ensuring that all relevant information is shared with the concerned parties to enable a just determination of the matter. The disposal of the appeal and stay application was contingent upon rectifying the procedural deficiencies and granting the appellant an opportunity to address the discrepancies in the calculation of clearances.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found