TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court dismisses petitions challenging Income-tax Officer's Section 34 proceedings. Assessee not entitled to reasons upfront.</h1> <h3>THE PRESIDENCY TALKIES LTD. Versus FIRST ADDITIONAL INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CITY CIRCLE II, MADRAS</h3> The High Court of Madras dismissed petitions seeking a writ of prohibition against the Income-tax Officer for proceedings under Section 34 of the ... - The High Court of Madras dismissed the petitions seeking a writ of prohibition against the Income-tax Officer for proceedings under Section 34 of the Income-tax Act. The court held that the reasons for initiating action under Section 34 do not need to be communicated to the assessee, and the notice itself does not need to specify the period for reassessment initially. The petitions were dismissed with costs.
TaxTMI 
