1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal waives pre-deposit, stays recovery pending appeal in Service Tax case interpreting Rule 6(3)</h1> The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues and stayed the recovery pending appeal disposal in a case involving the interpretation of Rule 6(3) of the ... - Issues involved: Interpretation of Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 regarding adjustment of excess Service Tax paid, time limitation for demand issuance, applicability of Tribunal decision pre-1.3.2007.Interpretation of Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994:The appellant, as recipient of GTA service, adjusted excess Service Tax paid towards their liability during specific months. The original authority held that such adjustment was not covered under Rule 6(3) and demanded the excess amount along with penalties. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the order, except for one penalty.Time limitation for demand issuance:The appellant argued that the demand issued was time-barred as the adjustment was appropriately informed in the returns. The appellant also cited a Tribunal decision allowing regularization pre-1.3.2007.Applicability of Tribunal decision pre-1.3.2007:The appellant contended that their case was covered by a Tribunal decision predating the relevant amendment. The Tribunal found no dispute regarding the excess payment and its utilization for part payment of Service Tax, leading to a prima facie dismissal of the demand.Final Decision:Considering the circumstances, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues and stayed the recovery pending appeal disposal. The appeal was scheduled for final hearing on 02.03.2011.