Section 33A complaints allow tribunals to decide industrial disputes on merits, not just technical breach of Section 33.

A complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act gives the Tribunal an independent remedy to adjudicate the underlying industrial dispute on merits, not merely to record whether Section 33 was technically breached. Read with Section 33, the complaint is treated as if it were a dispute referred to or pending before the Tribunal, so the Tribunal may examine whether the discharge or alteration was justified. The text also states that a decision on a debatable question of law does not amount to an error apparent on the face of the record, and such a finding is not to be interfered with in writ proceedings on that basis.

---

---

Issues: Whether, on a complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, the Tribunal's jurisdiction is confined to determining contravention of Section 33 or extends to deciding the merits of the dispute between employer and workman.

Analysis: Section 33A treats the employee's complaint as if it were a dispute referred to or pending before the Tribunal and requires adjudication in accordance with the Act. The provision was enacted to give the workman an independent remedy and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. Read with Section 33, the complaint procedure is not limited to a bare finding of breach and automatic restoration of status quo. The Tribunal is competent to examine whether the discharge or alteration was justified on merits, even though the employer may have contravened Section 33 by acting without prior permission. The headnote to Section 33A cannot cut down the scope of the statutory language. The Court also held that a decision on a debatable question of law, such as the validity of Rule 17(4) under Section 58 of the Municipal Boroughs Act, does not amount to an error apparent on the face of the record.

Conclusion: The Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide the substantive dispute on merits, and its finding could not be interfered with in writ proceedings on the ground of lack of jurisdiction or apparent error of law.

Final Conclusion: The petition failed and the rule was discharged.

Ratio Decidendi: A complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act enables the Tribunal to adjudicate the underlying industrial dispute on merits, and not merely to record a technical contravention of Section 33.

---