Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the property in the goods had passed to the Government of India before the goods entered the municipal limits so as to claim exemption from octroi.
Analysis: The contract terms governed the point at which property would pass. The purchase conditions provided that the goods would remain at the supplier's risk until delivery was completed, that delivery would be completed only upon successful testing and issuance of the taking over certificate, and that the date of receipt by the consignee at site would be treated as the date of delivery. Under Section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, property passes when the parties intend it to pass. On the contractual terms, the intention was that title would pass only after delivery and successful testing. The reference to Section 22 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 did not assist the appellant because the contract itself specifically postponed passing of property. The certificate and departmental letter asserting Government ownership did not alter the legal position.
Conclusion: The property in the goods had not passed to the Government of India when the goods entered the municipal limits, and the octroi exemption was not available. The appeal was therefore liable to be dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a contract expressly postpones passing of property until delivery is completed and a specified acceptance event occurs, title does not pass earlier merely because the goods are destined for the Government.