Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order of eviction under Section 21 of the Mamlatdar's Court Act, 1906 could be executed after a long lapse of time in the absence of any prescribed period of limitation.
Analysis: The order of eviction had already become final. Section 21 of the Mamlatdar's Court Act, 1906 did not prescribe any limitation for execution of such order. In the absence of a specific limitation in the special statute, the general law of limitation was treated as excluded by necessary implication. The plea that the power to execute must nonetheless be exercised within a reasonable time was rejected because the statutory scheme itself governed the field.
Conclusion: The execution of the final eviction order was not barred by limitation and could be proceeded with at any time. The contention based on delay failed.