Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the profit arising from the isolated purchase and later sale of land acquired at a court auction was assessable as an adventure in the nature of trade under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The transaction was not shown by the department to have been entered into with the dominant intention of resale at a profit. The assessee's money-lending business did not, by itself, convert every purchase of land into trading stock or a business venture. In the case of an isolated transaction outside the ordinary line of business, the burden lay on the department to establish that the purchase and sale bore the characteristics of trade. On the facts found, there was no material to infer that the land was acquired as a trading adventure rather than as an investment, and a mere possibility of future appreciation was insufficient to stamp the transaction as a business venture.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative. The profit from the isolated court-auction purchase and sale was not assessable as an adventure in the nature of trade, and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: An isolated purchase and resale is taxable as an adventure in the nature of trade only if the department proves, from the surrounding facts and circumstances, that the transaction was entered into with the dominant intention of making a trading profit.