Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proposed vertical short form amalgamation of a foreign amalgamating company with its foreign holding company, resulting in vesting of shares of an Indian company in the amalgamated foreign company, gives rise to tax liability in India on capital gains.
Analysis: The arrangement was examined under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 and the India-Canada DTAA. Although article 14(2) permitted India to tax gains from alienation of the Indian shares, the domestic exemption in section 47(via) applied if the transfer was in a scheme of amalgamation of a foreign company holding shares in an Indian company, at least 25 per cent of the shareholders continued in the amalgamated foreign company, and the transfer did not attract capital gains tax in Canada. The proposed transaction satisfied the statutory concept of amalgamation under section 2(1B), and the Canadian corporate law mechanism of a vertical short form amalgamation was treated as meeting the amalgamation requirements. On the Canadian tax position, the relevant provisions were read as indicating that the amalgamation would not give rise to taxable capital gains unless section 69(11) was attracted, and on the facts placed before the Authority no such Canadian tax incidence was shown.
Conclusion: No capital gains tax in India was chargeable on the proposed amalgamation under section 47(via), subject to the condition that the gains are not assessed to income-tax in Canada on the transaction or on a subsequent series attracting section 69(11) of the Canadian Income-tax Act.