Partner's contribution of personal property to firm capital was not a deemed gift, but business exemption failed.

A partner's contribution of individual property to the capital of a firm is a transfer of property because the partner's exclusive interest becomes a shared interest. It is not a gift or deemed gift under the Gift-tax Act where the consideration cannot be monetarily ascertained at the time of transfer, and a mere credit to the capital account is not treated as the true consideration in the absence of an express deeming rule. The claimed business exemption also fails because a contribution made on formation of the firm does not satisfy the statutory requirement that the gift be made in the course of the donor's own business for a bona fide business purpose.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether a partner's contribution of individual property to the capital of a firm constitutes a gift or deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958; (ii) Whether the exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 is available for such contribution at the time of constitution of the firm.

Issue (i): Whether a partner's contribution of individual property to the capital of a firm constitutes a gift or deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958

Analysis: A contribution of an individual asset by a partner to a firm is a transfer of property within the extended definition in the Gift-tax Act, because the partner's exclusive interest is reduced to a shared interest. However, a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) arises only where property is transferred for inadequate consideration. The consideration attributable to such a partnership contribution is not capable of being ascertained in monetary terms at the time of transfer, and the credit entry in the partner's capital account does not represent the true value of consideration. In the absence of a deeming provision equivalent to section 45(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the book entry cannot be treated as the consideration for testing adequacy. On the facts, the transaction was bona fide and not a sham device.

Conclusion: The contribution is a transfer of property, but it is neither a gift nor a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.

Issue (ii): Whether the exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 is available for such contribution at the time of constitution of the firm

Analysis: The exemption applies only to gifts made by a person in the course of carrying on his own business, profession, or vocation, and for the bona fide purpose of that business, profession, or vocation. A contribution made at the time of formation of the firm does not satisfy the requirement that the donor must already be carrying on the business in the relevant sense, nor was the transfer shown to be made for the purpose of the donor's own business. The statutory conditions for the exemption were therefore not met.

Conclusion: The exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 is not available and the issue is decided against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference is answered by holding that the partnership contribution is a transfer of property but does not attract gift-tax as a gift or deemed gift on these facts, while the claimed business exemption is unavailable.

Ratio Decidendi: For a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, the value of consideration must be ascertainable at the time of transfer; where the consideration for a bona fide partner's contribution of personal property to firm capital is incapable of monetary ascertainment, inadequacy of consideration cannot be assessed and no deemed gift arises.

---