Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the company's purchase and resale of shares, undertaken to obtain a dividend and tax repayment, constituted a trade or an adventure in the nature of trade so as to attract relief under section 341 of the Income Tax Act, 1952.
Analysis: The transaction was not to be judged by its fiscal consequences alone, but the Court held that its real character had to be ascertained from what was actually done. The company had altered its objects to deal in shares, bought all the issued shares of a company with accumulated profits, received the dividend, and then resold the shares. A majority held that the absence of an intention to earn an ordinary trading profit did not negative trade, and that recovery of tax was not a trading activity in itself but could be a result flowing from a transaction that was otherwise commercial in character. The commissioners' conclusion that the transaction was not trading could not stand because, on the facts, the operation bore the essential features of a share-dealing adventure.
Conclusion: The transaction was an adventure in the nature of trade and the company's loss claim was allowable in principle.
Ratio Decidendi: A transaction does not cease to be trading merely because it is entered into with a fiscal motive or with a view to tax recovery, if judged objectively it has the essential features of a commercial adventure in the nature of trade.