Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (2) TMI 707 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules in favor of Assessee, dismissing Department's appeal, affirming purchase genuineness & upholding commission relief. The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal and partly allowed the Assessee's appeal. The Tribunal confirmed the genuineness of the purchases, deleting ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules in favor of Assessee, dismissing Department's appeal, affirming purchase genuineness & upholding commission relief.

                          The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal and partly allowed the Assessee's appeal. The Tribunal confirmed the genuineness of the purchases, deleting the entire addition made by the AO. The relief on account of commission and brokerage was upheld based on substantial evidence provided by the Assessee. The issue regarding the validity of the order under section 144 r/w section 254 was dismissed as not pressed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of non-genuine and bogus purchases.
                          2. Relief on account of commission and brokerage.
                          3. Validity of the order passed under section 144 r/w section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

                          Detailed Analysis of Judgment:

                          1. Disallowance of Non-Genuine and Bogus Purchases:

                          The Department appealed against the learned Commissioner (Appeals) for restricting the disallowance of non-genuine and bogus purchases to 25%. The Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in the manufacturing and export of stainless steel cutlery, had purchases from seven parties amounting to Rs. 1,75,10,053. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed purchases worth Rs. 82,84,497 after five parties could not be located and two parties did not confirm transactions. Despite several opportunities, the Assessee failed to furnish verification details. The Commissioner (Appeals) initially rejected additional evidence but was later directed by the Tribunal to admit and verify it.

                          During the second round of assessment, the AO reiterated the disallowance due to non-compliance by the Assessee. The Commissioner (Appeals), however, disallowed only 25% of the purchases, citing the Tribunal's decision in Vijay Proteins Ltd. v/s ACIT, stating that without purchases, there cannot be sales or exports. The Commissioner (Appeals) reasoned that the Assessee inflated purchase prices and saved on sales tax and octroi. The Tribunal, upon review, found that the Assessee provided substantial evidence, including bank statements, purchase invoices, and sales tax certificates, proving the genuineness of the purchases. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the entire addition made by the AO and partly sustained by the Commissioner (Appeals).

                          2. Relief on Account of Commission and Brokerage:

                          The Department contended that the relief of Rs. 3,41,238 on account of commission and brokerage was not covered in the assessment order. The AO had disallowed this amount under "Other Indirect Expenses" during the original assessment, which was confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal, however, restored the matter for fresh assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) adjudicated this issue, noting that the Assessee provided income tax records of the parties and payments were made through account payee cheques. The Commissioner (Appeals) deleted the disallowance based on affidavits, photocopies of cheques, and income tax records.

                          The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision, noting that the payments were made through account payee cheques, and the parties were assessed to tax, showing the commissions as their income. The nature of services rendered, such as negotiation of rates and timely execution of orders, was also considered.

                          3. Validity of the Order Passed Under Section 144 r/w Section 254:

                          The Assessee contended that the order passed by the AO under section 144 r/w section 254 was void ab initio and bad in law. However, no arguments were put forth by the Assessee's counsel regarding this issue, and it was dismissed as "not pressed."

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal and partly allowed the Assessee's appeal. The Tribunal confirmed the genuineness of the purchases and deleted the entire addition made by the AO. The relief on account of commission and brokerage was upheld based on substantial evidence provided by the Assessee. The issue regarding the validity of the order under section 144 r/w section 254 was dismissed as not pressed. The order was pronounced in the open Court on 22nd February 2013.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found