Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court could issue a writ of certiorari to quash an income-tax assessment order in view of the statutory bar on original jurisdiction in revenue matters.
Analysis: Section 226 of the Government of India Act, 1935 was treated as an express limitation on the High Court's original jurisdiction in matters concerning revenue and acts done in collection thereof. An assessment order had already been made, and the relief sought would require the Court to call for the record, examine the legality of the assessment, and quash it. That would amount to exercising original jurisdiction in a revenue matter, which the statutory bar forbade. The Court therefore held that certiorari could not be used in this context to challenge the validity of an income-tax assessment.
Conclusion: The writ of certiorari was not maintainable and the petition failed on the ground of want of jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 226 of the Government of India Act, 1935 bars the High Court from exercising original jurisdiction to review and quash an income-tax assessment order by writ of certiorari in a matter concerning revenue.