TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether lease rent, central excise duty and labour dues of a company in liquidation could be recovered from the auction purchasers; (ii) whether customs duty was recoverable from the auction purchasers on removal of goods from the Special Economic Zone; and (iii) whether the correctness of the quantum of duty could be decided in these proceedings.
Issue (i): whether lease rent, central excise duty and labour dues of a company in liquidation could be recovered from the auction purchasers.
Analysis: The lease rent had accrued to the company in liquidation before sale and was a liability of the company, not of the auction purchaser. The same principle applied to the central excise duty and penalty, which were liabilities arising from the company's pre-liquidation business activities. Labour dues were also not recoverable from the purchasers, as they rank for payment in accordance with the statutory scheme governing winding up and workmen's dues.
Conclusion: These liabilities could not be fastened on the auction purchasers and had to be dealt with in the liquidation proceedings.
Issue (ii): whether customs duty was recoverable from the auction purchasers on removal of goods from the Special Economic Zone.
Analysis: The duty was linked to removal of machinery and goods from the Special Economic Zone for home consumption. Under the statutory levy governing such removal, customs duty was payable on the goods when removed, and the auction purchasers could not avoid that incidence merely because the assets were purchased in liquidation sale.
Conclusion: Customs duty was recoverable from the auction purchasers.
Issue (iii): whether the correctness of the quantum of duty could be decided in these proceedings.
Analysis: The proceedings were confined to the question of liability, and not to a detailed examination of the calculation of the amounts demanded. Any grievance as to the quantification of duty or the applicability of duty to particular machinery was left open for appropriate proceedings before the Development Commissioner or otherwise in law.
Conclusion: The quantum of duty was not decided.
Final Conclusion: The auction purchasers were held not liable for the company's lease rent, central excise duty and labour dues, but were held liable for customs duty on removal of goods from the Special Economic Zone; the correctness of the amount demanded was left open.
Ratio Decidendi: In a liquidation sale, liabilities attributable to the company in liquidation before sale do not pass to the auction purchaser, but duties statutorily attracted by the purchaser's own act of removing goods from a Special Economic Zone remain recoverable from the purchaser.
TaxTMI 
