Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2010 (1) TMI 1156 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Supreme Court orders CBI probe in Sohrabuddin case The Supreme Court directed the State police to transfer all records to the CBI for a thorough investigation within six months, including a potential ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Supreme Court orders CBI probe in Sohrabuddin case

                            The Supreme Court directed the State police to transfer all records to the CBI for a thorough investigation within six months, including a potential larger conspiracy. Cooperation from police authorities of Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan was emphasized to ensure a fair probe into the fake encounter of Sohrabuddin Sheikh, disappearance and murder of Kausarbi, and the alleged involvement of high-ranking police officials. The Court asserted its jurisdiction to transfer the investigation post-charge sheet to uphold justice and public confidence.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Fake encounter of Sohrabuddin Sheikh.
                            2. Disappearance and murder of Kausarbi.
                            3. Alleged involvement of Gujarat Police and Rajasthan Special Task Force.
                            4. Request for CBI investigation.
                            5. Habeas corpus petition for Kausarbi.
                            6. Investigation and charge sheet adequacy.
                            7. Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to transfer investigation post-charge sheet.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Fake Encounter of Sohrabuddin Sheikh:
                            The writ petitioner alleged that Sohrabuddin Sheikh was killed in a fake encounter by the Anti Terrorist Squad (ATS) of Gujarat Police and Rajasthan Special Task Force (RSTF). The Supreme Court noted discrepancies in the police reports and the need for further investigation into the circumstances of Sohrabuddin's death.

                            2. Disappearance and Murder of Kausarbi:
                            Kausarbi, the wife of Sohrabuddin, was allegedly abducted and subsequently murdered. The court highlighted the need to investigate the events following her abduction, including her death and the disposal of her body. The court found the State's investigation into her disappearance and death to be inadequate and lacking in transparency.

                            3. Alleged Involvement of Gujarat Police and Rajasthan Special Task Force:
                            The involvement of high-ranking police officials from Gujarat and Rajasthan in the alleged crimes was a significant concern. The court noted that the State's investigation was not impartial, given the involvement of its own officials in the alleged crimes.

                            4. Request for CBI Investigation:
                            The writ petitioner requested a CBI investigation, arguing that the local police were biased and not conducting a fair investigation. The court agreed, citing precedents where investigations were handed over to the CBI even after charge sheets were filed, to ensure impartiality and thoroughness.

                            5. Habeas Corpus Petition for Kausarbi:
                            The petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus to produce Kausarbi. However, it was later revealed that Kausarbi's body had been disposed of by burning. The court restrained from issuing a formal writ but emphasized the need for a comprehensive investigation into her death.

                            6. Investigation and Charge Sheet Adequacy:
                            The court found significant discrepancies in the investigation reports and charge sheets filed by the State police. It noted that the investigation did not properly identify all involved parties, including police personnel from Andhra Pradesh, and failed to establish the motive behind the killings. The court criticized the State's investigation for not conducting necessary tests like NARCO analysis and for not following proper procedures.

                            7. Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to Transfer Investigation Post-Charge Sheet:
                            The court addressed the legal question of whether it could transfer the investigation to the CBI after the charge sheet had been filed. Citing several precedents, the court concluded that it had the authority to transfer the investigation to ensure justice and public confidence, especially when high-ranking officials were implicated.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Supreme Court directed the State police to hand over all records to the CBI within a fortnight. The CBI was ordered to complete the investigation within six months, covering all aspects of the case, including the possibility of a larger conspiracy. The court emphasized the need for cooperation from the police authorities of Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, and Rajasthan. The judgment aimed to ensure a fair and impartial investigation, given the serious nature of the allegations and the involvement of high-ranking police officials.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found