Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether agricultural land acquired by the Government was a capital asset within the meaning of section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether, for section 2(14)(iii)(a), the relevant population criterion had to be applied to the municipality as a whole rather than to any part of the municipal area.
Analysis: The land was agricultural and had been transferred on acquisition, but its treatment for capital gains depended on whether it fell within the statutory exclusion for agricultural land. The controlling question under section 2(14)(iii)(a) was the meaning of the expression relating to a municipality having a population of not less than 10,000. The binding Supreme Court authority had settled that the population test relates to the municipality or cantonment board itself, not to any area within it or a former village area comprised therein.
Conclusion: The land did not escape the definition of capital asset on the basis contended, and the questions were answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by applying the Supreme Court rule that the population threshold under section 2(14)(iii)(a) is to be assessed with reference to the municipality as a whole, leading to a decision favouring the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of section 2(14)(iii)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the population condition is to be determined with reference to the municipality or cantonment board as a whole, not to any part of its area.