Distinct statutory levy under a composition scheme is not a rate change; circular demanding extra tax was invalid.

A distinct statutory levy does not amount to a change in the rate of an existing tax for a composition scheme unless the statute expressly alters the pre-existing rate or measure. The Supreme Court held that the State Development Tax introduced under amended Section 3-H was a separate charge with its own charging mechanism, not a mere enhancement of tax rate under the proviso to Section 7-D of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948. The circular treating it as a rate change and requiring dealers under composition to pay the additional levy was based on an legal premise and was invalid; the High Court's quashing of the circular and related assessments was affirmed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the circular dated 04.06.2007 issued by the Commissioner of Trade Tax, Uttar Pradesh was valid in treating the introduction of State Development Tax as a change in the rate of tax under the proviso to Section 7-D of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948, and consequently requiring dealers under the composition scheme to pay State Development Tax in addition to composition money.

Analysis: Section 7-D permits composition of tax liability on agreed terms, and its proviso operates only where there is a change in the existing rate of tax after the agreement. Section 3-H, as amended, introduced State Development Tax as a separate levy with its own charging mechanism and not as a mere enhancement of the rate of tax already payable under the composition arrangement. The introduction of a new tax creates an independent charge and does not amount to a change in the rate of tax on goods within the meaning of the proviso to Section 7-D. The circular therefore proceeded on an incorrect legal premise in directing recovery of State Development Tax from dealers already covered by composition agreements.

Conclusion: The circular dated 04.06.2007 was invalid and was rightly set aside. The issue is answered in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeals failed and the High Court's decision quashing the circular and related assessments was affirmed, while leaving the authorities free to proceed in accordance with law for any fresh demand, if otherwise permissible.

Ratio Decidendi: Introduction of a distinct statutory levy does not amount to a change in the rate of an existing tax for the purpose of a composition agreement unless the statutory provision expressly alters the pre-existing rate or measure of that tax.

---