1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court Upholds Tribunal Decision on Cost Plus Method for Arm's Length Price 'sLengthPrice</h1> The High Court Bombay dismissed the revenue's appeal for assessment year 2002-03 regarding the Cost Plus Method used by the assessee to determine Arm's ... Computation of Transfer pricing adjustment - Tribunal accepting the Cost Plus Method adopted by the assessee to arrive at Arm's Length Price determined by the Transfer Pricing Officer - Held that:- Tribunal accepted the the Cost Plus Method to arrive at Arm's Length price in respect of its international transaction relating to purchase of raw materials. The Tribunal also records the fact that Assessing officer has accepted the Cost Plus Method adopted by the respondent assessee in arriving at Arm's Length Price for subsequent assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The appellant revenue does not urge that the facts in the subsequent years are materially different from the facts existing in the present assessment year - No substantial question of law - Decided against revenue. The High Court Bombay dismissed the revenue's appeal for assessment year 2002-03 regarding the Cost Plus Method used by the assessee to determine Arm's Length Price. The Tribunal's decision was upheld based on consistency with subsequent assessment years. No costs were awarded.