Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Supreme Court upholds 1993 Rules, allows tax recovery pre-objection

        RAI VIMAL KRISHNA & ORS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

        RAI VIMAL KRISHNA & ORS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. - 2003 AIR 2676, 2003 (1) Suppl. SCR 358, 2003 (6) SCC 401, 2003 (5) JT 333, 2003 (5) SCALE 184 Issues Involved:
        1. Compliance with the provisions of the Patna Municipal Corporation Act, 1951 in the preparation of valuation and assessment lists.
        2. Mode of publication of the assessment list under Section 149(1) of the Act.
        3. Preparation of assessment lists in a piecemeal manner.
        4. Recovery of tax based on the assessment list before the disposal of objections under Section 150.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Compliance with Provisions of the Act:
        The appellants argued that the Corporation did not follow the provisions of Sections 133, 134, and 137 of the Patna Municipal Corporation Act, 1951 in preparing the valuation and assessment lists. The High Court rejected this submission, stating that the steps were taken as per the 1993 Rules, which were upheld by the Supreme Court in State of Bihar V. S.K.P. Sinha. The Supreme Court affirmed this view, noting that the valuations and assessments were prepared in accordance with the 1993 Rules and the notifications issued thereunder.

        2. Mode of Publication of the Assessment List:
        The appellants contended that the mode of publication prescribed under Section 149(1) of the Act was mandatory. The High Court accepted this contention but held that since the appellants received individual notices under Section 149(2) and filed applications for review under Section 150, the irregularity in publication was not consequential. The Supreme Court clarified that while the requirement for public notice under Section 149(1) is mandatory, the specified mode of publication ('by beat of drum and by placards') is directory. The Court held that publication in newspapers was a substantial compliance with the requirement, given the context and the effectiveness of the notice.

        3. Preparation of Assessment Lists in a Piecemeal Manner:
        The appellants argued that the assessment list could not be prepared in a piecemeal manner for different properties. The High Court did not accept this submission, noting that Section 149(1) allows for area-wise assessments and the Corporation's explanation of administrative difficulties. The Supreme Court agreed, citing the proviso to Section 138(1) and the flexibility in the language of Section 149(1), which permits assessments for parts of Patna.

        4. Recovery of Tax Before Disposal of Objections:
        The appellants claimed that the new rate of tax could only take effect after the objections under Section 150 were decided. The High Court did not explicitly address this submission but directed the disposal of objections within three months. The Supreme Court held that the assessment list, once prepared and published, remains valid and effective until revised or amended under Sections 151 or 152. Therefore, the Corporation can recover taxes based on the assessment list pending the disposal of objections. The Court emphasized that merely filing an objection does not halt the tax realization process.

        Conclusion:
        The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision with different reasoning. The Court upheld the validity of the 1993 Rules and the notifications, confirmed the substantial compliance with the publication requirement, and allowed the recovery of taxes based on the assessment list pending the resolution of objections. The appellants' objections were directed to be disposed of within a specified timeframe.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found