Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the average count of round mesh mosquito netting could be determined for the purpose of Notification No. 226/77-C.E. by applying the formula later prescribed by Notification No. 210/79-C.E., and whether the benefit of the concessional notification was available for the prior period.
Analysis: The earlier notification did not lay down a specific method for computing the average count of mosquito netting, but the absence of a detailed formula did not mean that the average count was incapable of determination. The later notification was treated as supplying the manner of calculation and not as enlarging the scope of the concession. On that basis, the same method could be used for the earlier period to ascertain the average count of the fabrics in question.
Conclusion: The average count of the mosquito netting was determinable, and the method prescribed by Notification No. 210/79-C.E. was able to the present matter for working out the average count. The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the concessional notification.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a later notification merely clarifies or supplies the method of calculation that was previously omitted, it may be applied to earlier cases to determine eligibility under the earlier concessional notification, provided it does not enlarge the substantive scope of the exemption.