Interpretation of undefined statutory terms supports section 80-IC deduction for limestone powder manufacturing and partial household-expense relief.

Where a statutory expression is undefined, allied enactments and contextual material may be used to construe it according to its ordinary meaning. On that basis, limestone was treated as forest produce and limestone powder manufacturing in Himachal Pradesh was regarded as a non-timber forest product based industry for deduction under section 80-IC. The note also records that agricultural land under cultivation justified some allowance against household expenses, so the estimated household expenditure was reduced by granting only partial benefit of agricultural income. The appeal was therefore partly allowed, with the deduction claim accepted and the household-expense addition sustained only to the reduced extent.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether limestone powder manufacturing in Himachal Pradesh qualified as a non-timber forest product based industry for deduction under section 80-IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether the addition towards household expenses required reduction by granting benefit of agricultural income.

Issue (i): Whether limestone powder manufacturing in Himachal Pradesh qualified as a non-timber forest product based industry for deduction under section 80-IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The expression "non-timber forest product" was not defined in the Income-tax Act, 1961, and assistance could be taken from allied material, including the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the Himachal Pradesh industrial policy. On that basis, limestone was treated as falling within forest produce, and the undertaking manufacturing limestone powder in Himachal Pradesh was considered to fall within the relevant entry in the Fourteenth Schedule.

Conclusion: The claim for deduction under section 80-IC was allowed in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the addition towards household expenses required reduction by granting benefit of agricultural income.

Analysis: The assessee had agricultural land under cultivation, which justified some allowance towards agricultural income for meeting household expenses, though not to the extent claimed. The estimated household expenditure was therefore required to be moderated by granting a partial benefit of such income.

Conclusion: The addition towards household expenses was reduced and the assessee succeeded partly on this issue.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was partly allowed, with the deduction claim under section 80-IC allowed and the household-expense addition sustained only to the reduced extent.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory entry is undefined, allied enactments and contextual material may be used to construe it according to its ordinary meaning, and a claimant may receive a partial allowance where evidence supports only limited relief.

---