Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit taken on parts and consumables used in capital goods installed for manufacture of texturised yarn was inadmissible merely because the final products were cleared partly under exemption notifications and partly on payment of duty.
Analysis: The credit related to items used as parts of the machinery and capital goods employed in manufacture of the same goods for which the assessee availed the benefit of Notification Nos. 29/2004 and 30/2004. The record showed that the assessee had taken credit in the prescribed manner and that the goods on which credit was taken were eligible inputs or capital goods. In such circumstances, the demand to reverse proportionate credit on the footing that exempted clearances were also made was found to be misdirected.
Conclusion: The credit was held to be admissible and the demand for reversal was rejected.