Redemption fine and penalty on used multifunction machines cannot be enhanced without market enquiry or proof of profit margin.

Old and used digital multifunction print and copier machines were treated as multi-functional goods, and the reduction of redemption fine and penalty was upheld because the lower appellate authority's approach aligned with prior decisions in similar cases. The Revenue's request for enhancement failed since no market enquiry was conducted under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, and no margin of profit was established to justify higher amounts. The Tribunal also found that the cases cited by the Revenue did not warrant restoring the original fine and penalty, while the importers' circumstances supported the reduced quantum already ordered.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Revenue had made out a case for enhancement of the redemption fine and penalty imposed on import of old and used digital multifunction print and copier machines.

Analysis: The goods were treated as old and used digital multifunction machines capable of performing more than one function, and the reasoning adopted by the lower appellate authority was found consistent with the line of decisions reducing fine and penalty in similar matters. The Tribunal noted that the goods fell within the category of multi-functional machines and that the cases relied upon by the Revenue did not justify restoration of the higher amounts. It was also noted that no market enquiry had been conducted as contemplated by Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, no margin of profit had been established to warrant enhancement, and the circumstances relied upon by the importers supported the reduction already ordered.

Conclusion: The Revenue was not entitled to enhancement of the redemption fine and penalty, and the impugned orders reducing those amounts were upheld.

---