Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Credit Co-ops Eligible for Tax Deduction: Tribunal Clarifies Section 80P</h1> <h3>M/s. Shree Laxmananda Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd. Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (3), Mangalore</h3> M/s. Shree Laxmananda Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd. Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (3), Mangalore - [2014] 34 ITR (Trib) 472 (ITAT [Bang]) Issues Involved:1. Eligibility for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act post-amendment by Finance Act, 2006.2. Classification of the assessee as a co-operative bank or a credit co-operative society.3. Applicability of section 80P(4) to the assessee.4. Impact of judicial precedents and CBDT Circular on the interpretation of section 80P(4).Detailed Analysis:1. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i):The primary issue revolves around the eligibility of the assessee, a co-operative society providing credit facilities to its members, for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee claimed this deduction, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) based on the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2006, effective April 1, 2007. The AO interpreted that the amendment excluded co-operative banks from availing this deduction, thereby classifying the assessee as a co-operative bank rather than a credit co-operative society.2. Classification of the Assessee:The AO classified the assessee as a co-operative bank, arguing that the nature of its activities, despite being registered as a credit co-operative society, aligned with those of a banking institution. This classification was based on the provisions of Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, which defines a co-operative bank. The AO cited sections 56(b), 56(cci), 56(ccv), and 56(ccvi) of the Banking Regulation Act to substantiate that the assessee's activities were akin to those of a banking institution.3. Applicability of Section 80P(4):The AO's decision to disallow the deduction was upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Mysore. However, the Tribunal, referencing its decision in the case of Asst. CIT v. Bangalore Commercial Transport Credit Co-operative Society Ltd., clarified that section 80P(4) applies only to co-operative banks and not to credit co-operative societies. The Tribunal emphasized that the legislative intent behind the amendment was to bring co-operative banks at par with commercial banks, not to exclude credit co-operative societies from the benefits of section 80P(2)(a)(i). Therefore, the assessee, being a credit co-operative society, remained eligible for the deduction.4. Impact of Judicial Precedents and CBDT Circular:The Tribunal also considered the judgment of the Gujarat High Court in CIT v. Jafari Momin Vikas Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., which dealt with a similar issue. The High Court held that section 80P(4) excludes only co-operative banks, not credit co-operative societies. This interpretation was further supported by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) Circular No. 133 of 2007, dated May 9, 2007, which clarified that section 80P(4) does not apply to entities that are not co-operative banks. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee, being a credit co-operative society, was entitled to the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act. The stay petition filed by the assessee was rendered infructuous and dismissed as such. The judgment underscores the distinction between co-operative banks and credit co-operative societies and affirms the latter's eligibility for tax deductions under the specified section.Pronouncement:The judgment was pronounced in the open court on August 1, 2014.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found